Most people think
I am exaggerating when I tell them that the 9-11 "truth
movement" is dominated by wolves in sheep's clothing. Those
of us who expose corruption actually face two problems:
- Convincing people that our government is corrupt beyond anything
they dreamed possible.
people that most of the "truth seekers" are
trying to cover up the corruption, or they are rival
criminals trying to take over while Bush appears vulnerable.
The 9-11 attack is not a game
of people were murdered, billions of dollars worth of
property was destroyed, and thousands are still suffering
health problems from breathing the demolition debris.
And wars are still going on because of the attack. The
people who did 9-11 have a lot to lose if they are exposed,
and they have a lot to gain if they remain in control.
Furthermore, 9-11 was not their first crime. Many of them
were involved in other crimes that they must cover up.
Do you really think these people are so foolish that they
will sit idly by while people expose them? If so, take a
look at some of the suspicious suicides and accidents during
the past decade.
Webb committed suicide by shooting himself in the
head, twice. Mike
Ruppert insists this is possible.
Other people suspect Ruppert is a wolf in sheep's clothing
who is trying to deflect attention away from the Zionists
and onto the CIA, vice-president Cheney, and Peak Oil. Some
think Mossad killed Gary Webb.
Deception is the preferred weapon
up suicides and airplane accidents is expensive and risky,
so they kill us only as a last resort. They prefer to
pay hundreds, maybe thousands, of people to pretend to
be 9-11 "truth seekers".
The best way to get away with a crime is to be the
investigator of the crime. Since people have trouble understanding
this concept when I explain how it applies to 9-11,
maybe it will be easier to understand if you imagine how
it could happen to you. So let's look at how a gang of
car thieves can get away with stealing your car.
Let's assume that you have a neighbor named Joe, who you
assume is an ordinary, honest citizen. In reality, Joe is
part of a gang that steals cars, and Joe wants to steal your
car. What is the best way for Joe and his gang get away with
Warn the victim ahead of time
Joe could tell you that he was browsing an Internet site
where car thieves often send messages to each other, and
he noticed a lot of chatter about stealing a car in your
neighborhood. A few days later, Joe steals your car. Your
first reaction would be,
what a fool I am. I should have listened to my wonderful
neighbor Joe, who tried to warn me."
people would wonder, "Wait a
minute... if you know where car thieves are talking
to each other on the Internet, why not tell the police
and let them identify the people?"
Offer to help solve the crime
When you tell Joe that your car was stolen, Joe fakes sadness.
Joe then announces that he wants to rid the neighborhood
to start an organization of truth seekers who will assist
the police in their search for evidence. He tells you
that he will collect information about the crime and pass
it on to you and the police.
You would be grateful to Joe. It would never occur to you
that Joe is sifting through all of the evidence that comes
to him and discarding anything that implicates Joe or his
friends in the crime. The only evidence he passes on to the
police are the ones that send them in the wrong direction.
By fooling people into sending him the evidence, Joe also
finds out which citizens he has to watch, and possibly blackmail
Give false evidence
pay some of his criminal friends to pretend to be witnesses
to the theft of your car. The news reporters and police
would never suspect that these witnesses are actually
part of the gang that stole your car, and that they are
sending the police in the wrong direction. Joe could also
pay his friends to call radio talk shows to spread the
false evidence to the public.
Joe could also pay his friends to request the radio talk
shows and newspapers to interview Ralph. This creates the
impression that Ralph is a popular person, but in reality
he is a member of the gang that steals cars, and all he really
wants to do is spread false information.
Find naive people to pay for the cover-up
a few months Joe could ask for donations. He could complain
that running the investigation is time-consuming and expensive,
and he would appreciate donations of any type. The
naive people who donate money would not realize that
they are paying Joe to cover up his crime.
Few, if any, of the people who donate money will have the
nerve to ask Joe how much money is being donated, or what
happens to that donated money. The few who ask will be provided
with deceptive answers.
Asking for money has an additional advantage; specifically,
it fools people into assuming Joe is an ordinary, honest
citizen, not a wealthy criminal with secret sources of money.
Bury the truth with nonsense
Some people in your neighborhood might take it upon themselves
to investigate the theft of your car simply because they
are concerned about crime. They might discuss evidence on
message boards and web sites.
These independent, truly honest citizens are a threat to
Joe's gang because they might discover that Joe is involved
in organized crime. They might even put up a web site that
To protect himself, Joe pays his criminal friends to join
the honest message boards and pretend that they are honest
citizens who want to uncover the truth about the crime. In
reality they would post thousands of idiotic and deceptive
messages. They would bury the few useful messages.
Give conspiracy theories a bad image
turn some people away from the few honest web sites by
giving a bad image to the people who claim Joe is a criminal.
Joe could pay his friends to post ridiculous theories
in order to make the message boards look like they are
dominated by people with mental disorders. For example,
one of Joe's friends could post a photograph that shows
a blurry, mysterious object in the sky above Joe's car.
The object is a bird that is out of focus, but Joe's friend
tries to encourage people to believe that it might be
an alien spacecraft, and that perhaps the aliens stole
your car for their museum of human technology.
Another of Joe's criminal friends could announce that he
heard from a reliable source that your car was picked up
by the police along the Polish-Austrian border.
By flooding the message boards with stupid and deceptive
messages, the honest messages are lost in the nonsense. Some
of the honest citizens who look at the message board will
be so overwhelmed by the nonsense that they ignore the issue.
Simulate discussions on message boards
Joe could pay his friends to join Internet message boards
using false names. The purpose would be to simulate discussions.
They would pretend they were independent citizens. For a
simplistic example of how a conversation might appear, assume
that Joe inherited some money when his father died:
Ralph: I think Joe is stealing cars.
Bob: Why do you say that?
Frank: You shouldn't accuse Joe of a crime without proof.
This is disgusting!!!!
Ralph: Well, Joe has a lot of money. How could he get so
much from an ordinary job?
Bob: Yeah, Joe does have a nice house, and an expensive car.
Frank: You might be on to something Ralph. We should call
Jim: Stop it, you idiots! I know Joe, and he recently inherited
money when his father died.
Ralph: Oh, I feel so stupid for jumping to conclusions.
Bob: Me too. I hope Joe doesn't read these messages.
Frank: We owe Joe an apology.
Find useful idiots to promote nonsense
It is difficult to lie. The best way to spread false information
is to find a fool to do the work for you. Convince the fool
that the lie is actually the truth, and then the fool will
spread the lie for you. Since he believes the lie, he will
be sincere when he talks about it. An example are the people
who try to convince us that the airplanes that hit the World
Trade Centers were holograms.
Make Joe appear to be a victim
Joe's friends could post messages on a regular basis that
make fun of the people who accuse Joe of crimes, such
"Oh, yeah, we all know
Joe stole the car. I saw it on the Internet, so it
must be true!"
When there is a serious traffic accident, or a severe rainstorm,
Joe's friends could post messages such as:
we all know, the accident was Joe's fault. It's always
Joe's fault. Let's blame Joe!"
"I suppose Joe
will be blamed for the thunderstorm! Everything is Joe's
These messages will fool a few naive people into assuming
that Joe is always a victim, and we should not consider the
accusations to be serious, similar to the way Pollacks were
the primary subject for jokes when I was a child.
Outnumber the honest sites
pay his criminal friends to create thousands of "truth
seeker" web sites in order to bury the few honest web
sites. When honest citizens look on the Internet for
information about car thefts, they will almost certainly
encounter one of the deceptive web sites from Joe's friends,
not one of the honest web sites. The end result is that
they get a distorted or unpleasant view of the subject.
Boast about honesty
his "truth seeker" web sites appear more
honest, Joe could tell his friends to openly boast about
their honesty. For examples of the possible remarks:
World's Most Trusted Source For Truth".
- "Established Experts In Counter Propaganda"
- "The World's Only Established Experts In Counter Propaganda
- "We Demand Honesty in Government".
If those silly statements fool a few people, then it was
worth Joe's money and time.
Give the honest citizens a bad image
honest citizen exposes information that Joe does not want
exposed, Joe could pay his friends to find something about
the citizen to complain about. For example, if a citizen
creates a video that exposes Joe's gang, the gang could
try to give the video a bad image with such remarks as,
video looks like some amateur made it in his garage.
You will embarrass those of us in the Truth Seeking
movement if you show people such crummy video!"
guy's voice is terrible! You can't show that lousy video
to people! It will turn people away! Come on, he needs
a professional narrator!"
Even if only a few people are fooled into keeping the video
a secret, Joe will benefit.
Joe's friends can also spread rumors about the citizen, such
as he is anti-American, a Fascist, a Nazi, an anti-semite,
or a communist. Lots of people are affected by those insults,
which is why they are so frequently used.
Create a maze of links to all deceptive sites
tell his friends to link their web sites to each other.
When each of the sites have a few links to a couple of
the other sites, it creates the illusion that each site
provides more information. The honest
citizen assumes that every time he clicks on another
of the links that he is getting a better understanding
of issue, when in reality every site he clicks on is from
the same criminal organization.
Link to honest sites only when pressured
Joe tells his friends to include a few links to one or two
honest sites only when people start wondering why they ignore
those honest sites. However, they will put the link in an
obscure place. This creates the illusion that they are aware
of the honest sites, and that they support the honest sites,
but in reality a couple links in an obscure location will
not have any significant effect.
Make the honest sites appear controversial
the truth groups might write,
is no consensus among the truth seekers as to whether
Joe actually committed any crime. However, in order
to be fair, we provide all sides of the issue, and so
we provide you with an article from Jim, who believes
Joe is a criminal. "
This technique creates the impression that they are fair
and unbiased. Unknown to the common people, Jim is one of
Joe's friends, and he deliberately writes his article in
a manner that most people will disregard.
Furthermore, by providing lots of compliments, they take
advantage of the people who are suffering from low self-esteem.
over the evidence and decide for yourself. We don't want
to tell you what to think. The American people are intelligent,
educated people. We provide the information, you make
Accuse the honest citizens of being car thieves
When a citizen exposes Joe or his gang, Joe could accuse
that citizen of being a member of a gang of car thieves who
is trying to fool people into thinking Joe is the criminal
in order to hide his own crimes. Other members of Joe's gang
can accuse other citizens of being car thieves.
If Joe's friends create hundreds of these accusations, the
ordinary citizen can become so overwhelmed with the complexity
that they will not be sure who to trust.
Set blackmail traps for government officials
Joe and some of his friends could produce child pornography
and arrange trips to Thailand to have sex with children.
Imagine that your father purchases a trip to Thailand. One
of Joe's friends can then use blackmail to control what your
father says and does, but your father would not realize that
Joe is involved in this blackmail. Your father would be working
for Joe without realizing it. If some of the news executives
or police officials in your city purchase trips to Thailand,
then Joe could influence the news and the police. Joe could
also pressure these blackmailed officials into hiring Joe's
criminal friends. Eventually Joe could acquire a lot of control
over your city.
Another type of blackmail trap is to encourage people to
profit from Joe's crimes, such as buying stock in one of
Joe's companies that sells stolen car parts.
Even if only a few policemen, lawyers, and FBI agents can
be lured into this, those few people add to the officials
that Joe can control with blackmail.
Become a victim of mysterious hate crimes
To further keep himself in control of the city, Joe could
pay a friend to spray a swastika on his house. Some naive
people will feel sorry for Joe; they will defend him when
he is accused of being a criminal. Joe could also call the
newspaper and television reporters to his house and announce
that he is a victim of a hate crime, and that the city must
pass hate crime laws to stop the attacks on innocent crime-fighters
and truth seekers. He could use the hate crime legislation
to demand the arrest of people who try to expose him.
Create organizations to arrest Joe
pay his friends to create organizations that want to arrest
Joe. For example, one of the organizations might be called
ACT, which stands for Arrest Car Thieves. The
ACT web site is full of anger towards Joe. The organization
demands that Joe be arrested. They also ask people to
join their organization. However, in reality they
want the names and addresses of their potential enemies.
Furthermore, Joe might also be able to use some of the ACT
members as useful idiots. For example, Joe's friends might
be able to convince one of them to throw a rock through Joe's
window. That person could later be arrested, reinforcing
the belief that ACT is a group of idiots who commit senseless
acts of violence, and that the city needs hate crime legislation.
Joe can also look through the members of ACT to see if any
of them can be blackmailed, bribed, or threatened.
You must be careful when you join organizations, and you
must be very critical of the leadership, but very few people
Deflect attention to the government
Joe could pay his friends to divert attention to the mayor
of the city, who Joe helped to elect. The mayor is an idiot,
so Joe hires people to create web sites and newspaper articles
that ridicule the mayor and imply that he is responsible
for the crime because he did not provide enough money for
the police, or because the mayor is allowing corruption due
to his stupidity. One of Joe's friends might write an article
that the mayor was warned that a car might be stolen, but
the mayor ignored the warning. This implies that the stupid
mayor is the reason cars are stolen.
Another of Joe's friends might write an article that implies
that perhaps the mayor let your car get stolen so that he
could use the theft of the car as justification for increasing
the police budget.
By writing hundreds of slightly different, idiotic theories,
the public will be confused, and many people will not notice
the honest articles.
Let your friends expose you as a last resort
Because it is possible that Joe will eventually be exposed
as a criminal, Joe prepares for that possibility by arranging
for lots of his friends to be truth seekers who expose Joe
as a criminal. The way this deceptions works is if Joe decides
that he can no longer cover up his crime because some citizens
are about to expose some critical information, he can tell
his friends to quickly expose him before the honest citizens
do it. This allows Joe's friends to become the honest crime
fighters who expose a terrible criminal. His friends will
be the center of attention, and they can then try to minimize
the damage and punishment, and prevent the rest of the gang
from getting caught.
See the similarity to 9-11, JFK, etc?
My imaginary example of how Joe could steal your car is happening
with the September 11 attack, and all of the other big crimes.
However, the deception with 9-11 is much more intense and
take a look at 911truth.org, a group of "truth
seekers" in New York City. In their description
of themselves they write:
is a campaign to educate the public about the Sept.
11th coverup and inspire popular pressure to overturn
the "incompetence theory" and
expose the truth surrounding the events of 9/11; namely,
that elements within the U.S. government must have
been complicit, or worse, for the attacks to happen
the way they did.
Since 911truth.org wants to expose the truth, you might expect
them to show the evidence that the towers and Building 7
were demolished with explosives. But they have the following
remark about this issue:
The Case for Demolitions
is no consensus on this issue among 911Truth.org staff
or within the 9/11 truth movement, but here is a collection
of articles, many of them by Jim Hoffman, arguing that
the WTC buildings must have been demolished using explosives.
Plus a few past milestones on the evidence. Judge for
see the deception?
Levis has a role of some sort with this group. That fact
alone should make you suspicious of them. Since at least
2002 several people have been complaining that Nicholas
Levis cannot be trusted.
Jimmy Walter allowed Levis to help set up a 9-11 meeting
in New York City. During the meeting it became so obvious
that he was a trouble-maker that security guards had to
drag Levis out of the meeting.
Here is WingTV's
description of Levis.
And: Levis is War Criminal
most members of 911truth are honest!"
After I wrote this article, some people complained that most
members of 911truth.org are honest citizens. Most of the
employees of the Enron Corporation may have been honest,
but that doesn't mean the executives of the company can be
times do these 9-11 "truth seekers" have
to behave in a suspicious manner before you ignore them?
What if somebody commits suicide by chaining himself
to a fence and then shooting himself with a firing
squad, and what if Mike Ruppert announces that this is
entirely possible? Would you continue to trust Ruppert,
or would you ask yourself,
a minute, how can Ruppert be so certain it was a suicide?
Why doesn't Ruppert want an investigation? Why are we
looking to Ruppert for guidance when he makes such stupid
The inability to select quality leaders is one of the world's
primary problems. Most people turn to whoever makes them
feel good; whoever gives them praise, entertainment, and
people make for Tom
Flocco is another example. I have
heard some people say something like,
Flocco might make some dumb remarks about Barbara Olson,
but some of what he says is true, so we should continue
to look to him as a leader of the truth movement."
This is as ridiculous as somebody saying,
Bush might be involved in 9/11 and numerous other big
crimes, but some of what he does is useful, so we should
continue to follow him."
If you make excuses for idiotic and criminal behavior, how
are we going to take care of our nation?
Watch out when they deflect attention to Bush
of people realize that George Bush is a puppet, but who
is telling Bush what to do? A "truth seeker" named
Dr. Justin Frank has the answer. He tells us that George
Bush is a puppet, but he is "A Puppet Who Chose His
Dr. Frank is trying to convince us that there is no need
to look at the people giving orders to George Bush because
George Bush chose those people. Therefore, to understand
the actions of George Bush, we only have to look at George
Dr. Frank wants us to believe that if we look at Bush's puppeteers,
we will discover that they are following the orders of George
Bush. Does this make sense to you?
Most of Bush's opponents are liars
are a lot of critics of the Bush administration, but very
few of them are honest about 9/11, the Kennedy assassination,
the attack of the USS Liberty, or any other scam. They
claim to be "truth seekers" who want to get rid
of the evil Bush government and replace it with an honest
government. However, none of these truth seekers are
Many of the truth seekers seem to be part of the group that
gave us 9-11, and some of the truth seekers seem to be part
of a rival group of criminals who are fighting with the Bush
administration for control of America. You and I are just
pawns in their game of world conquest.
The MoveOn organization encourages their members to get together
and be exposed to videos and other information about corruption.
This is a wonderful method to educate people. The organization
has tremendous potential. However, the only information that
their members are exposed to is propaganda that makes the
Bush administration and the Fox news network look like evil
organizations. The MoveOn members are some of the most ignorant
people when it comes to 9/11 and other crimes. The most likely
explanation is that George Soros and other people behind
the MoveOn organization are a rival gang fighting for control
of the American people. They are not interested in exposing
crime; rather, they are interested in getting control of
the people. They are deceiving their members with their particular
Some people suspect George Soros of being in the same criminal
gang as George Bush, but for all we know, they are on different
teams that work together sometimes, but fight with each other
most of the time. As with Al Capone and other gangs, people
such as Soros and Bush may be selfish beyond anything you
have imagined, and both of them may fantasize about killing
Example: The Air America radio network
claims to be providing people with the truth, but just
like Tom Flocco, Mike Ruppert, 911truth.org, and most
other "truth seekers" who
condemn Bush, they appear to be either working with
Bush, or working with some rival group of criminals. They
titillate their listeners with insults about Bush and
corporations, but they suppress a lot of important books,
people, and subjects.
When Mike Malloy had a show about the 9/11 attack (on September
30, 2005), one of the people who helped Air America get started,
Steve Sinton, decided to sit in the studio with him.
The show is available at this site:
It is Malloy's show on Friday, September 30th, 2005.
The direct link to the mp3 file is:
I suppose Mike Malloy knows a lot about the 9/11 attack,
and the management of Air America were concerned that he
or his callers might let out too much information. So they
sent Sinton to sit in the studio with Mike, and Sinton tried
to promote the idea that conspiracy theories about 9/11 are
The people who listen to Air America are as deceived as the
people who watch the television news. The naive citizens
who provide Air America with money, advertising, or any other
support are helping a group of criminals.
of the groups we call "liberals" are
wolves in sheep's clothing. They are not exposing corruption,
nor are they educating people. Rather, they are taking
advantage of the anger towards Bush, Republicans,
and corporate greed.
The liberals condemn Bush for being stupid, and they criticize
Republicans for having incompetent leadership, but the leaders
for the liberals are just as corrupt. If the liberals had
even 20% of the intelligence they think they have, they would
investigate Soros, Sinton, and all of the other top ranking
Example: the Green Party
complaining to a member of the Green Party that the Green
Party is worthless, and one of the reasons I gave was
that they will not tell their members about 9/11. His
response was that the leader of the Southern California
branch, Mike Feinstein, was a psychopath, and that he
is merely dishonest, not part of the 9-11 cover-up. He
explained to me that Feinstein was accused by his fellow
Green Party members of stealing
money from the Green Party.
Why would anybody remain a member of the Green Party when
they think their leader is a psychopath? Well, for the same
reason millions of people followed the Kings and Queens of
Europe, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, and Bush. Namely, humans
and animals have a strong tendency to follow, and most humans
and animals are lousy at thinking.
If it is true that Feinstein is stealing money from the Green
Party, he may be part of the criminal network that gave us
9-11. Or the criminal network may have noticed that Feinstein
is dishonest, and they are using his criminal background
to blackmail him. Perhaps the reason that nobody can remove
him from the Green Party is because he has a lot of support
from a lot of criminals. Or perhaps he is honest, and the
criminals are trying to make him appear to be a criminal
in order to get rid of him!
Regardless of whether Feinstein is an honest citizen, a psychopath,
or a blackmailed criminal, the Green Party is not providing
their members with any useful information, so what value
does the Green Party have? Why are the members wasting their
time and money with such a worthless organization?
The Green Party is not helping America. It is of more use
to the Bush administration and other criminals because it
suppresses information about corruption. The same is true
of almost every other large organization.
Example: The anti-war groups
the organizations that claim to be struggling for peace
refuse to provide information about 9-11 and other corruption.
Worse yet, they stop attempts by their members to discuss
these issues. The leaders of these groups have a lot of
excuses as to why they will not discuss 9/11 and other
crimes. For example, I have heard some leaders of Veterans
for Peace insist that they want to support veterans, so
9/11 is not an issue that concerns them. However, the
war is based on the 9/11 attack, so if they really want
to stop the wars and help the veterans, they should expose
the 9/11 hoax.
Are the leaders of the Veterans for Peace groups truly so
stupid that they cannot see the value in exposing 9/11? Or
are they afraid to expose it because they worry they will
die in an airplane crash? Or are the leaders part of the
criminal network that is trying to cover up these crimes?
Or are they blackmailed or bribed into covering up these
I don't know what is wrong with Veterans for Peace or the
anti-war groups, but I know better than to join or support
a useless organization.
Which organization is of value?
There are thousands of organizations and web sites that claim
to be trying to help us. However, we must judge an organization
and their leaders by their accomplishments, not by what they
promise. If you belong to an organization, ask yourself,
what has it done for you or the world? Be serious when answering
that question. Be as critical of your organization as you
are of President Bush. Don't be a hypocrite by supporting
a crummy or corrupt leader while you condemn Bush for corruption
and incompetence. The world does not improve from hypocrisy;
it improves when people develop intelligent suggestions and
do some real work.
Unless we raise standards for people in leadership position,
nothing will improve. We don't need a rival group of criminals
and hypocrites to replace Bush. We need to get higher quality
Be more critical of message boards
you look at an Internet message board, see if you can
spot the simulated conversations. For example, the following
is a real message from
a message board.
started doubting that man went to the moon. I remember
then asking them to use HUBBLE to take pictures of the
moon so we could see the flag and any other crap they
left. They said they couldn´t use hubble to photgraph the moon because it
was too close to earth. I just noticed this article that
says the Hubble can look at the moon.
take some pictures of your blast craters
that message was posted, somebody else pointed out that
the Hubble does not have the power to see a flag on the
a simulated conversation? It becomes easier to answer
that question when you look through the other messages
on the board. The above "discussion" appeared
on 20 Oct 2005. On 5 Oct 2005 somebody else posted
similar message, and on 23 Aug 2005 almost the
conversation occurred. Take a look now in case they
erase or edit them.
Although we will never know for certain, I think all three
of those messages are coming from people who are trying to
cover up the Apollo moon landing hoax.
out for "fishermen"
that criminals use is perhaps best described as "fishing". For example, somebody might post
a message that he thinks George Bush was involved in 9/11.
In reality he is hoping to identify people who agree with
him, or he is trying to determine what percentage of the
people on the message boards have this opinion. There are
some sites on the Internet that appear to be "Nazi" or
anti-semite sites. For example:
casual observation of those sites, I would guess that
they are operated by FBI agents or Zionists, and I suspect
that they are looking for people who are angry at the
US government or Israel. They post angry messages, such
all Niggers and Jews!". The angry messages are like
worms on a hook, and they wait for people to bite them. Even
stranger, there are a lot of sites that are are registered
to "Network Solutions", a company located in Herndon
Virginia. Some of them are angry sites, some are "truth
seeker" sites that provide deception, and some of them
offer pornography that is so extreme that most Internet
service providers would not tolerate them. For example,
the following web sites are all registered to Network Solutions:
all of these sites claiming Network Solutions is the registrant?
Is there a connection between these sites?
I don't know the answer to those questions, but I would consider
the possibility that they are sites of a government agency
(not necessarily the American government), and that they
are watching everybody who contacts them.
Most of the customers and employees of Network Solutions
may be honest, but that doesn't mean the company can be trusted.
More details about Network Solutions
the late 1990s, everybody purchased Internet domain names
from Network Solutions because they had a monopoly. Therefore,
it is not surprising that lots of web sites show "Network
Solutions" as the company the domain was registered
with. I am not accusing Network Solutions of being a
criminal organization. Instead, I am suggesting we consider
the possibility that they and other Internet service
companies have been infiltrated by criminals.
There are many accusations that Israel was tapping American
phone lines, spying on government officials, and blackmailing
Americans. And don't forget about the accusations of their
involvement in 9/11, the USS Liberty attack, the JFK assassination,
the Apollo moon landing, and numerous other crimes.
have also been many examples of organized crime getting
involved with legitimate businesses for a variety of reasons.
not consider the possibility that Israel -- or some other
group -- is infiltrating Internet service companies?
When you catch somebody lying to you or committing a crime,
you should assume that you caught only a fraction of their
total lies and crimes. Only a fool would think that he caught
their one and only crime. And when you catch a nation lying
to you hundreds of times, why not wonder if maybe they lied
more than a hundred times?
just three examples of Israeli spies:
We should not be afraid to look critically at business executives,
politicians, FBI agents, and other people in positions of
Why would a criminal network, or a foreign government, would
want to infiltrate Internet service companies? Lots of reasons.
- To observe government e-mail and data
If a criminal network can convince government agencies to
call their technicians to provide technical services for
their Internet computers, the criminals will be able to get
access to their e-mail and data without going through the
Internet. This makes it impossible for anybody to realize
that they are snooping. Also, if Network Solutions can convince
a government agency to use the computers and phone lines
of Network Solutions for web sites, that gives Network Solutions
direct access to the email and data of the government agency.
- To acquire blackmail material
If a prostitute, pornography producer, con artist, or car
thief were to make the mistake of letting a criminal organization
host his web site, those criminals would be able to snoop
through his e-mail and identify his customers.
- To cause trouble for customers they don't like
an employee at Network Solutions caused serious disruption
to Al Jazeera's web site. Different news reports explain
it differently, but it is described as a "mistake".
Here is one account:
Racine hijacks Al-Jazeera
And here is another:
attack on Al-Jazeera
happen all the time, but it is possible that it was
- To upload videos from Osama
you will hear that an Al Qaeda terrorist posted a message
or a video on the Internet. Have you ever wondered how
they do this without being identified? If Network
Solutions is hosting a site that is owned by an Arab,
they could put messages and videos directly onto the
The Arab would have no idea how the Al Qaeda terrorist posted
video onto his site, and neither would any of the honest
FBI agents. It would never occur to anybody that a technician
in Virginia transfered the video directly onto the computers
from a CD-ROM.
Even if Network Solutions does not have direct access to
any Arab site, they could upload the video from their computers
in Virginia, and if an honest FBI agent contacted them about
it, the conversation would go like this:
FBI agent: It looks as if one of your customers uploaded
a video to a web site in Iraq. Could you look into it for
Solutions: Certainly! We are patriotic, honest Americans,
and the last thing we want is a terrorist to be using our
(Several days later.)
Network Solutions: Sorry Mr. FBI agent. We carefully studied
all of our records, but we could not find anybody posting
to Iraq. You made a mistake. But don't worry; we won't tell
your boss about your incompetence. We'll forget you ever
suspected such a stupid thing. You can return the favor in
- To disrupt other people's web sites
an employee at Network Solutions was reported to have
caused a computer to send corrupted files to 10 servers
around the world. The mistake caused messages to be returned
to senders and cut off access to US web sites for some
European users. Note: It is the 7th
paragraph down in this document
Certainly this could be an accident, but it could also have
been deliberate sabotage, or a test of whether they can bring
down the entire Internet.
- To spread viruses and spam
When a group of criminals are in control of an Internet service
provider, they can spread viruses, spam, and spy programs
without worrying about somebody calling the FBI. This is
especially true if the criminals work for the FBI. If an
honest FBI agent traced some of the viruses to the criminals,
he would be told by that he must be mistaken.
Most of us (or all of us?) get spam messages every day. How
could somebody possibly spread so much spam without the FBI
figuring out who is doing it? And how can people possibly
spread viruses without the FBI figuring out who is doing
For all we know, the viruses are coming from government agencies,
and virus protection companies have been infiltrated by these
same agencies in order to secretly send back information
about how the virus protection software can be defeated.
Perhaps the FBI arrests virus producers only if they are
not part of their criminal network.
Why would any government want to produce viruses? To waste
our time and money. If the goal is to destroy America, everything
that hurts America is another nail in the coffin. Viruses,
spam, and junk faxes may seem insignificant, but they waste
a lot of time, money, and resources.
As I learn more about Network Solutions I may discover that
they are wonderful, responsible people. Perhaps I will discover
that Christopher Bollyn is correct that the company Tucows is the company we should be investigating.
It is not difficult to solve these crimes
have a dilemma. Specifically, if they try to cover up
their crime, they
risk giving us clues about who they are and how they did
the crime. But if they remain hidden,
they risk being exposed by those of us who are investigating.
The FBI could figure out who some of the criminals are
simply by watching the message boards for suspicious activity.
The FBI could also identify the criminals by watching the
honest citizens to see who contacts us via email, phone,
and in person. Some of the people who contact us are criminals
who are trying to fool us with false information.
If the FBI was interested in solving crimes, it would not
be difficult for them to identify thousands of suspects.
These crimes are occurring right in front of our faces. The
criminals get away with them because the government is covering
them up, and most people cannot figure out who to turn to
for guidance, not because there is a shortage of evidence.