dust shutting out of a few windows
seen photo’s of the attack on September 11th. These photo’s
make it appear as if a few Arabs attacked America,
and that the airplane crashes and the fires caused the buildings
to collapse. However, when we take a closer look at how the buildings
collapsed, we can see evidence that explosives were used. For
example, dust shut out of a few windows far below the collapsing
area. This dust is caused by extremely high pressure, but it comes
out of only a few windows. It is a couple of 100ft below the collapsing
area. When we look closely at the area collapsing,
we find dust shooting out of every window of the entire floor
at the same time. The towers had a steel frame so the only way
they could collapse in such a symmetrical manner is if thousands
of joints were broken simultaneously.
resistence from the floor below
The towers collapsed
in less than 10 seconds, which is an average of 10 floors every
second. Next time you see a 10 storey building, imagine the entire
building collapsing in 1 second. The only buildings that collapse
this quickly, are the ones destroyed with explosives. We were
told that the collapse began when one floor broke and the pieces
fell to the floor below it. Those pieces shattered that floor,
and so on, all the way down. However, when the pieces hit the
floor below, they will slow down slightly because some of their
energy will be used to break the floor. Therefore there should
be a delay every time the pieces hit a floor. The towers had 110
floors, so if it took 1 second for each floor to be crushed, that
would be 110 seconds.
north tower collapsed in 8.4 sec.
seismic data show that the structure of the north tower broke
apart in only 8.4 seconds. The collapse started at about the 94th
floor. If you were to drop a rock from the 94th floor, it would
hit the ground about 8.4 seconds later. This means that the building
broke apart as fast as objects fall through the air. How can debris
crash through steel and concrete floors as fast as they fall through
the air? There is only one explanation: explosives were placed
in those buildings before the attack. The north tower started
to collapse when explosives near the 94th floor were detonated.
The explosives were timed so that the joints were shattered before
the rubble contacted the floor below it. In other words, the building
broke apart in only 8.4 seconds because explosives, not falling
debris, broke the joints.
Windsor Tower in Madrid, before, during and after the inferno
We were told
that fire caused the collapse, but no large building has ever
collapsed from a fire. This 32-storeyed skycraper in Madrid, Spain,
is a good example. The fire became so intense that it spread from
one floor to the next causing the building to look like a torch.
This fire was much larger than the fires at the Wold Trade Center.
The next morning there were still a few fires in the lower floors.
the building had been burned. Some sections of the building broke.
A few portions at the top of the building collapsed. However,
the building remained standing and it continued to support a large
construction crane at the top. By comparison, the fire in the
south tower was so small that it never spread to the other side
of the tower. This inability to spread is proof that the fire
was small. Furthermore, we know that firemen made it up to the
fire zones of both towers because they used their hand held radios
to send reports of their arrival. The fires were too small to
kill firemen, so how could they be large enough to cause the south
tower to disintegrate after burning for only 56 minutes? The fire
in Madrid was much more intense and it burned all night, but it
did not cause the building to collapse.
this temperature map of the rubble 5 days after the collapse.
Obviously the rubble would be cooler after 5 days. Also firemen
sprayed water on the rubble during those 5 days. However one location
in the rubble of building 7 was above the melting point of aluminium.
And so was one location in the rubble of the south tower. How
can a building fall down and 5 days later the pieces are hot enough
to melt aluminium? The presidents of two different companies that
were cleaning up the area said that steel had melted at the bottom
of the basements in the towers and building 7. These incredible
temperatures are more evidence that explosives were used.The collapse
of building 7 provides more evidence of explosives. This was a
47-storeyed building with a steel frame. It was not hit by an
airplane. It was across the street from the towers. Late in the
afternoon this building collapsed. The government investigated
the collapse of this building. After 7 months of investigating
their conclusion was: they have no idea why the building collapsed.
A few months later the landlord of the building, Larry Silverstein,
announced on television that the fire department demolished the
building. The government and the news reporters should have demanded
that both Silverstein and the fire department explain what happened
to building 7, but nobody asked any questions. The collapse of
building 7 is identical to the collapse of buildings that are
brought down with explosives. The explosives shattered the joints
that are holding the building together, and the building falls
down at free-fall speed. Dust is produced at the base of the building.
There is a tremendous
amount of evidence that the government created the September 11th
attack. We could spend days discussing all of it. My accusation
that the towers were demolished with explosives is based on scientific
fact and you cannot disagree with it. For example: pieces of a
building cannot crash through steel and concrete floors as fast
as they fall through the air. The fact that the frames of those
towers broke apart in 10 seconds is proof that explosives broke
the joints. Building 7 also collapsed in a manner that can only
be explained with explosives. This is why the government says
they do not know why building 7 collapsed. Anybody who looks at
this evidence and continues to insist that fires caused the buildings
to collapse, is simply having a difficult time facing the possibility
that the government could commit such a crime.
One reason it’s
difficult to believe that the government created the
September 11th attack is because none of their major news agencies
are talking about it. Some reportes refused to talk about explosives
because they are affraid to expose government crimes. Another
reason for their silence is that the television, newspapers and
magazines in America and Europe are controlled by a small number
of people. These people suppress evidence of the explosives and
they suppress people who come forward to support us. Such as the
physics professor at Brigham Young University (Utah). Instead
of reporting evidence of explosives they show us photos of Osama
Bin Laden. This creates anger towards Arabs and it fools people
into thinking the Arabs are responsible for the attack. The news
agencies are trying to manipulate emotions, not provide serious
Ridicule and insult as a weapon
reporter ignores or ridicules those of us who show
evidence of explosives in the towers. Already three different
television networks have criticized us. These television programs
do not provide serious information to counteract our arguments.
Instead, they use insults to make people laugh at us. Here is
how Penn & Teller introduced
Jimmy Walter: “And then there’s this arsehole!” My
book has been available since 2002, but it was ignored
by the magazines and television shows until Jimmy Walter began
advertising it. This is a portion of one of his full page newspaper
ads. Here is how Penn & Teller described my book: “He wrote
a book called ‘Painful Questions - An Analysis of the September
11th attack’. We show you the cover because if you ever
see anyone carrying it, push them down a flight of
Mechanics refers to us as liars. The angry and childish attacks
on Jimmy Walter and me could be a sign that the criminals are
frightened that we are exposing them. However, when a criminal
tries to cover up his crime, he runs the risk of releasing more
information about himself. These television shows and magazines
can help us understand who is behind the September 11th attack
and how they get away with these crimes. The executives of the
major television networks, newspapers and magazines are involved
in these crimes. They cover up the crimes by suppressing important
information and by insulting those of us who expose the crimes.
The news agencies that ignore or insult us are identifying themselves
as either being incompetent news agencies or as members of the
criminal network. In either case you should not purchase their
newspapers, magazines or television programs.
We could use
our technology to build beautiful cities for ourselves
with advanced train systems, but we need better governments and
better newsreporters. We must also prevent the criminals from
getting control of our 9/11-organizations. I will give you an
example: I had been invited to speak at a meeting about September
11th in March 2004 in San Francisco. However, a week before the
meeting I was told that I was not allowed to speak. They did not
explain why I could not speak. The criminals are trying to get
control of the 9/11-organizations so that they can remove people
like me. They fool you into thinking that they are on your side.
They are trying to put all the blame on president Bush or Dick
Cheney. They want to suppress the evidence that lots of people
from several nations are involved, such as U.S. military officials,
television executives, and some Israeli and British government
officials. People often respond that they cannot do anything about
this corruption because they are just an ordinary person of no
importance. But everybody can help make this world a better place
simply by showing our books, videos and websites to your friends.
So help us educate and encourage people. Let’s make this
a better world.