|
|
The Planetary System, Part 3
written by Frank Hoogerbeets
April 30,
2006
Sometimes it is
said that time is an illusion. As I said in the previous
part, time can not be observed as we observe distance
and velocity. You cannot see time. You can only measure
it. If you were to live on another planet, e.g. Mars,
the “length” of
a day or a year would be different than on Earth, and
so would be your perception of time. Only in relation
to distance and velocity we can measure time (formula
A in part two).
Looking at the
mathematical model of objects revolving around a central point,
it appears that the time it takes for an object to revolve can
only be measured in relation to the movement of another object (or
in relation to another movement of the same object).
If there is only one object (and one movement), we
could define its orbital time by any number we would like, because
there is no point of reference!
Those not familiar with Mathematics or Physics may want to skip the
next part.
Just as in the previous part, we define the mean orbital time as
1 (t = 1). Next we want to know the relation between the mean orbital
time of the first object and the mean orbital time of the next object.
This is how we determined the mean orbital velocity for each planet:

We will use this formula to determine the mean orbital time of an
object. For this purpose again we look at formula A from part 2:

For our convenience we square the formula:

We have also seen that in this case the distance S is the
circumferemce 2πr. So for any object n the formula
would be:

Because the mean
orbital time of the first object is
1 and the mean orbital time of each subsequent object
relates to the first object, we can thus derive the
formula to calculate the mean orbital time of any object n:

Finally we apply the formula to our planetary system by entering
15 for r1:

We can now enter the mean distance rn of every planet n into
to formula. With the time values found the table for our planetary
system will look like this:
| Planet |
Math.
Mean
Distance |
Calc.
Mean
Distance |
Math.
Orbital
Velocity |
Calc.
Orbital
Velocity |
Math.
Orbital
Time |
Calc.
Orbital
Time |
Vulcan |
15 |
? |
94,25 |
? |
1,00 |
? |
Mercury |
60 |
57,9 |
47,12 |
47,87 |
8,00 |
7,59 |
Venus |
105 |
108,2 |
35,62 |
35,02 |
18,52 |
19,41 |
Earth |
150 |
149,6 |
29,80 |
29,78 |
31,62 |
31,56 |
Mars |
240 |
227,9 |
23,56 |
24,13 |
64,00 |
59,34 |
Asteroids
(Maldek) |
420 |
? |
17,81 |
- |
148,16 |
- |
Jupiter |
780 |
778,4 |
13,07 |
13,06 |
374,98 |
374,49 |
Saturn |
1500 |
1426,7 |
9,42 |
9,64 |
1000,00 |
929,90 |
Uranus |
2940 |
2871,0 |
6,73 |
6,79 |
2744,00 |
2656,70 |
Neptune |
4380 |
4498,3 |
5,52 |
5,43 |
4989,70 |
5205,09 |
Pluto |
5820 |
5906,2 |
4,78 |
4,67 |
7642,71 |
7829,72 |
Eris |
11580 |
10123,4 |
3,39 |
3,44 |
21449,93 |
17578,92 |
? |
23100 |
? |
2,40 |
? |
60433,96 |
? |
If you’re
used to the time values of your clock, the values
in the table won’t make much sense. That is because
they express how the mean orbital time of the planets
relate to each other. As I have said before, the Universe
is comprised of relations. That is why I have not
explicitely used quantities like meters or seconds.
Quantities are man made and just as people on Earth
cannot agree on what quantities to use, civilizations
on other worlds would, if at all, definitely use entirely
different quantities. The values in the table however,
are universal. The distance from the Earth to the
Sun could be expressed by any quantity you would
like, but 150 remains 150 in relation to 15.
To translate the
time values to our system of measurements, we use
a so called matrix.
The time value 31,62 (Earth) could relate to our 365
days in a year if we would want to express time in
days. If we would then want to know how many Earth-days
it takes for Venus to complete one revolution around
the Sun, we say that 31,62 relates
to 365 as 18,52 relates
to X, or in formula:

So Venus would
complete one revolution around the Sun in 213,78 Earth
days. Keep in mind that for clearity, in this example
the mathematical values are used, not the real values.
In reality there are several factors that influence
the movement of celestial bodies. Even the most accurate
ephemerides are approximations and only valid for
a limited period of time.
But what is important
here, is that there is obviously a blueprint (mathematical
model) on which the structure of our planetary system
is based. Such a blueprint does not come into existence
on its own; an intelligent force is required to do
that. In the same manner the DNA of our humanoid body
is also a blueprint. With this knowledge of the structure
of our planetary system I dare to say that nothing
in the Universe happens by chance and that every manifestation,
be it a galaxy, a star, a planet, a human being, an
animal, a plant, or a stone, is preceded by a blueprint
that is designed by an intelligent force or form of
consciousness, and that (a small part of) that consciousness
builds up this form according to its energetic blueprint.
So here it is: the origin of the human body. Scientists
still don’t
know who or what is responsible for the coordination
with the placement of cells from the earliest stages
in the development of a foetus. Well I believe the
answer is given here and it is only a matter of time
that science will confirm this statement.

The Planetary System derives from a carefully designed blueprint

DNA – the
blueprint for all lifeforms
Copyright © Frank
Hoogerbeets, Ditrianum
Media Center You have my permission to copy and distribute this
article as long as you do not change its content including
this copyright notice.
|
|